A very good read.

[kandrathe]

Where did *I* say that? Did you even bother to visit the site? Or do you always react this way?:rolleyes:

You will notice I framed my post in the form of a question. I gave you room to clarify your position. You seemed to be advocating the site. Now, if you had said "Here is a crazy conspiracy theory site" I would not have posted.

Read before posting please. And direct your ire, if any, toward the folks at that site. I am neither affiliated with them, nor do I necessarily believe in what they have to say. I merely found it to be interesting reading.

I dub this... "The Ghostiger" defense. Which is, "You don't agree with me, so you must not have read it or be totally lacking in reading comprehension."

First there is no ire, I am calm. Sorry if you read ire into my post. I did go to the main page of the site and looked at the general thrust of the articles and decided it was so wacko that it was not worth my time reading much of the opinions of wacko conspiracy theorists. I opened the MIT engineer link you suggested and again a few minutes of his speaking (after a lengthy prelude of documented misconceptions) led me to the same conclusion. The purpose of that site in my opinion is disinformation which at it's most innocent is to deceive people in order to shape a political agenda. Sort of a politically focused "National Enquirer". So, not very interesting to me. I like my fiction to have a better plot.

Debunking the 9/11 Myths