Swiftmend: an analysis
#4
The thing here is, it's not a safe assumption there's always a druid HOT on the tank - a lot of druid healers have gone to healing touch only because of mana efficiency and wanting to avoid overheal. To calculate this from an efficiency point of view, you have to assume that you're doing both the HOT and the Swiftmend, not freeloading off of someone else's HOT.

Also, there's a significant difference between how much is healed by consuming Regrowth (938) and Rejuvenation (1288). This is because Regrowth is a considerably weaker HOT than Rejuvenation.

What I'm thinking is that whomever has the most +healing is going to be the rejuvenation druid, and will be keeping that up on the MT at all time. Hopefully Swiftmend will always consume Rejuvenation in preference over Regrowth. Then anyone who has Swiftmend should feel free to drop that on the MT when it's available. The Rejuvenator will be watching the MT's CTRA box for the rejuvenation effect.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Swiftmend: an analysis - by Tuftears - 05-18-2006, 08:51 PM
Swiftmend: an analysis - by VoiceMan - 05-18-2006, 09:17 PM
Swiftmend: an analysis - by Zarathustra - 05-18-2006, 09:30 PM
Swiftmend: an analysis - by Tuftears - 05-18-2006, 10:09 PM
Swiftmend: an analysis - by MongoJerry - 05-19-2006, 12:28 AM
Swiftmend: an analysis - by castille - 05-19-2006, 02:58 PM
Swiftmend: an analysis - by Mavfin - 05-19-2006, 03:35 PM
Swiftmend: an analysis - by Kevin - 05-19-2006, 06:45 PM
Swiftmend: an analysis - by Tuftears - 05-19-2006, 07:07 PM
Swiftmend: an analysis - by crowley - 05-20-2006, 04:46 AM
Swiftmend: an analysis - by Tuftears - 05-22-2006, 10:08 PM
Swiftmend: an analysis - by Tuftears - 05-23-2006, 12:33 AM
Swiftmend: an analysis - by Kevin - 05-23-2006, 01:15 AM
Swiftmend: an analysis - by Sir_Die_alot - 05-26-2006, 10:13 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)