05-17-2006, 02:11 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-17-2006, 04:13 PM by Occhidiangela.)
Ghostiger,May 17 2006, 07:44 AM Wrote:You ought to read the whole messy conflict before commenting. Its appearant you didnt. Im not saying the discourse is worth reading, but if you see it that way stay out of it.I am reminded of the story of the boy who cried "wolf."
I didnt go negative just because I disagreed. I get negative when people use flawed reasoning to support their positions. I consider that unfair.
I have explained how Mith made a a mistake. Now Mith is dsaying it was a semantics issue, but it wasnt it originally. Mith has since tried to muddy the water rather than accept that he mispoke originally.
If he had siimply started this by saying this by saying we should change our legal system to focus on rehabilitaion rather than punishment primarily I would have disagreed and thought him naive. But I wouldnt have been so insulting as I was in response to him saying that in our current system when you are released you rehabilitated.
[right][snapback]110133[/snapback][/right]
The CNN rehash of the event is a step away from the topic, whatever its merits and demerits, and toward escalating personal friction. Please invite K, R, and M to continue any further interpersonal disagreement via PM.
We now return you to your regularly scheduled program: "Aesop's Foibles." ;)
Occhi
Edit: There is no "t" in the middle of disagreement."
*Coffee, thou art a cruel mistress!*
Cry 'Havoc' and let slip the Men 'O War!
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete