New Orleans Is Flooded Again.

[Taem]

Doc # 3

Come up with another obvious and superficial idea presented as though its deep. Then go after the critic saying he has some human flaw for not agreeing with your secondary posts - even though he is adressing the first post.

You never tried an honest defense of your original stament - every thing since than has been a dishonest play to draw attention away from that fact.

Im not even commenting on your later posts substance  because they dont even interest me.
[right][snapback]103569[/snapback][/right]

Well, it may seem superficial to you, but the concept of working together as a community to solve our problems instead of blaming one another was profound to me at the time. Believe it or not, I like to write as I think and sometimes my thoughts - through their ebb and flow - take on a form all their own, however I think I finally see where your coming from. In my original post, I did a little "rant" bit about what are obviously the Bush administration’s public fallacies. In the context of the point I was trying to make, this is very counterproductive and I realize that now. As I said in my last post, it all sounded good to me upon review, but not until you questioned my motives did I realize why I felt the way I did. I was writing from emotion; raw, the way I like it. I'm not using this as an excuse, not hardly.

So why did I write that "rant" bit? Perhaps I was venting as you say. Upon reflection, I believe I was releasing my anger and frustrations at what I felt were this administrations shortcomings before I could "move forward" and write what I was really feeling under the surface. I know I wrote what was in my heart and I had no intention whatsoever of misleading anyone, nor to deceive. I'm sorry if you felt mislead by what I wrote, and I can see now how my “rant” was drastically out of context with the ideal I was trying to convey. While I don’t agree with everything you wrote, you were definitely in your right to believe what you said.

Perhaps an apology is in order for accusing you of “pointing the finger with spite,” when you clearly saw discrepancies with what I was trying to state. I do formally apologize to you, Ghostinger, for my little outburst. Do you understand now where I was coming from, or do you feel I’m still hiding behind this whole "hope" thing as some kind of charade to avoid what I wrote?