Honest Question

[Tal]

I never said you were dumb. You are just barking up the wrong tree, that's all. Nothing wrong with that... I just don't see it going any where.
[right][snapback]102563[/snapback][/right]

I believe you are the one that planted that particular tree sir. You brought up that the library actually spent man hours altering a magazine so that they can bring it up to western standards.

I also find it hard to believe that for a system that has Playboy on Microfilm would spend money doing such a thing to National Geographic. My question to you is why spend time doing such a thing when its cheaper and easier to not carry the periodical in the first place? If someone was going to complain about National Geographic's nudity then why carry Playboy on Microfilm at all?

The only damning piece of evidence I was able to locate thus far about your library system is that they had the poor taste to buy my library science reference book for their Main Library. But I'll continue to poke around my contacts in SC and the Greenville system and see what turns up. :)