+- The Lurker Lounge Forums (https://www.lurkerlounge.com/forums)
+-- Forum: The Lurker Lounge (https://www.lurkerlounge.com/forums/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://www.lurkerlounge.com/forums/forum-12.html)
+--- Thread: About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge (/thread-6347.html)
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Archon_Wing - 05-19-2005
I find it really funny that you at the Lurker Lounge would want to keep your elitism. You think you are above other sites. You actively claim that you are above the cesspool that is the rest of the Internet and work actively to maintain these standards. The general policy of Lurkers is to work hard to exclude people who do not conform to your lofty standards.
You know, I can see a gap between the purpose of this site and the standards that you claim to uphold.
It's obvious that you are hypocritcal, you claim yourself to be elitist while the truth is...
You aren't elitist enough.
Seriously, what the hell is this? Have you people seen a truly elitist forum? A real elitist forum would not tolerate dissent from n00bs. I have not seen a post here where a new member was properly hazed and flamed for no God damned reason except that he or she is new.
The regulars of a truly elitist forum would keep their members in line. If anyone voiced a diffrent opinion from the majority, they would immediately be banned. Obviously the community and the moderation here are too weak-willed to truly assert their rightful place in the forum. Just take the case of Abramelin. How long did it take this troll to be banned? If we were at a truly elitist forum, he would have been banned in three seconds after he made his first dissenting post and ninjas would have him dead by the next sunrise. Yes, ninjas, not some sissy hitmen. Damn, you people and your open mindedness disgust me!
And what's up with "A square peg trying to fit into a round hole?" How can you concede to him that he could be on the same level with you? He's not a peg at all, just some lowly thumbtack! And let's not even go into the fact that things are rarely perfectly circular or square. At least you could said, "A retangular peg trying to fit into a eliptical hole." Now that I think about it, what's up with the sexual innuendo? Shame on you!
Wasn't the goal of this website designed to be above the rest of the Internet cesspool you despise so much? Hell, ask some random dude on the battle.net forum. He would agree with me that the Lounge tries to be elitist. Elitism is perfectly acceptable for sites devoted to video games. We are here to show the rest of the world that we are better then them.
I am aware that some of you don't want to hear this and you don't want to change your humble/down-to earth ways.
If you want to ban/flame/insult me, that is perfectly fine. I won't care. And yes, I don't care even though I cared enough to post that I don't care. And yes, I don't care that I just posted the last two sentences about caring. If you do ban me I will find other forums that will suit my tastes. Such as here
I hope the Lounge will change its ways, so that it will become more open for self-righteous pricks like me.
This thread brought to you by a degree of teenage angst.
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Doc - 05-19-2005
What an ass clown! Screw the ninjas... Somebody let loose the pirates to plunder his booty!
And where is Deebye and Warlocke with their n00blar whipping images?
What a bunch of slackers. We need to clean this place up. Somebody get me... A WET NOODLE! That will fix everything.
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - DeeBye - 05-19-2005
My 8-digit employee number starts out 1337....
![[Image: tag3sz.jpg]](http://img283.echo.cx/img283/3566/tag3sz.jpg)
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Alram - 05-19-2005
1. The London Underground is not a political movement.
2. Aristotle was not Belgian.
3. Buddhist philosophy is not every man for himself.
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Archon_Wing - 05-19-2005
Doc,May 18 2005, 10:07 PM Wrote:What an ass clown! Screw the ninjas... Somebody let loose the pirates to plunder his booty!
And where is Deebye and Warlocke with their n00blar whipping images?
What a bunch of slackers. We need to clean this place up. Somebody get me... A WET NOODLE! That will fix everything.
[right][snapback]77851[/snapback][/right]
Must your responses always be so kinky? :blush:
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Archon_Wing - 05-19-2005
DeeBye,May 18 2005, 10:15 PM Wrote:My 8-digit employee number starts out 1337....
[right][snapback]77854[/snapback][/right]
Ah I must be clear. Not all members of the Lounge lack elitism. It's just most of them.
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Archon_Wing - 05-19-2005
Alram,May 18 2005, 10:17 PM Wrote:1. The London Underground is not a political movement.
Yet another sign of non-elitism. When you will not be so subtle enough to suggest inferiority by suggesting things that are underground, unable to see the light?
Quote: 2. Aristotle was not Belgian.
Go read Kant.
Quote: 3. Buddhist philosophy is not every man for himself.
Ah, but do you see any Buddhists leaders of any world powers? Their philosphy lies in another world, and is not important to the real world. Therefore, I conclude you are just avoiding my points.
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Occhidiangela - 05-19-2005
Archon_Wing,May 18 2005, 10:40 PM Wrote:I find it really funny that you at the Lurker Lounge would want to keep your elitism.
"And so on." [right][snapback]77845[/snapback][/right]
A reputation for elitism can be earned by setting a good example, what with the million monkeys pounding away and still no Shakespeare on the internet.
A pox upon the scurvy dogs of "other forums" who leak self esteem by failing to uphold our rather modest standards. A pox on a "pure elitist" sites, which can never achieve elite purity in any case, since imperfect Man is involved. (How many forums have Gris, I ask you?)
Have you not read Kant? Hegel? Cleese? Bryson? And if you have, why haven't you taken the books back to the library, they are six weeks overdue! :angry:
In the theme of attacking the poster and not the post, I will point out that:
Your sig is an unsupported assertion, not a fact. :lol: You wanna back it up with argument, or are you going to parade your inability to form a coherent thought the way a baboon parades his exposed glutes? :w00t:
Contra your unsupported assertion, I will state, based on lifelong observation.
Language is used to both inform and confuse.
Have you never read a newspaper? Have you never read one of my, or Doc's, posts? :unsure:
This post was brought to you by Keds, the gymnasts shoes. "Tricks are for Keds."
Occhi
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Alram - 05-19-2005
Archon_Wing,May 19 2005, 12:29 AM Wrote:Yet another sign of non-elitism. When you will not be so subtle enough to suggest inferiority by suggesting things that are underground, unable to see the light?No. You miss my point. More to the point, you don't watch the right movies.
Go read Kant.
Ah, but do you see any Buddhists leaders of any world powers? Their philosphy lies in another world, and is not important to the real world. Therefore, I conclude you are just avoiding my points.
[right][snapback]77858[/snapback][/right]
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - WarLocke - 05-19-2005
Archon_Wing,May 18 2005, 11:40 PM Wrote:This thread brought to you by a degree of teenage angst.
[right][snapback]77845[/snapback][/right]
You know, I was reading a related post a few days ago, and I couldn't help but imagine this look on our very own Abramelin's face:
![[Image: whyamlaughing.jpg]](http://s92592496.onlinehome.us/Files/Macro/whyamlaughing.jpg)
And man, these elitist posts need to stop, I don't think my old computer can handle them anymore!
![[Image: gayerror.gif]](http://s92592496.onlinehome.us/Files/Macro/gayerror.gif)
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - jahcs - 05-19-2005
Build a better bridge, troll.
If you want us to throw bread crumbs instead of rocks from it then it better have a damn sight better foundation than this one.
We want gilded sidewalks, four lanes of through traffic, and and imposing silhouette on the skyline.
Crawl back into your cardboard box and plan your next argument a bit better than this one. What good is a bridge that threatens to collapse under it's own weight?
B) :whistling: :w00t: :angry:
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Doc - 05-19-2005
Ignorant troll!
I bet you say nuclear as NU-KU-LAHR!
Illegitimate spawn of Jane Fonda and Janet Reno...
Wow that last one was pretty bad. **Shudder** Just thinking about that makes my testicles clinch and my bunghole pucker.
Edited for spelling errors, but not for content. Blah.
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Occhidiangela - 05-19-2005
Doc,May 19 2005, 10:21 AM Wrote:Illegitimate spawn of Jane Fonda and Janet Reno...
[right][snapback]77900[/snapback][/right]
Doc, the last time I checked the Geneva Conventions, this sort of stuff was prohibited. *still cringing*
Oh, wait, you are not a nation state, you are an Anarchist, never mind.
*shudders* What an incredibly bad visual. :huh:
Occhi
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Ashock - 05-19-2005
Occhidiangela,May 18 2005, 11:53 PM Wrote:"Tricks are for Keds."
Occhi
[right][snapback]77863[/snapback][/right]
Aweful, simply aweful :blink:
-A
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Tal - 05-19-2005
Just what I've come to expect from years of public schooling! Shut your festering gob, you tit! Your type really makes me puke, you vacuous, coffee-nosed, maloderous, pervert!
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Doc - 05-19-2005
Tal,May 19 2005, 11:55 AM Wrote:Just what I've come to expect from years of public schooling! Shut your festering gob, you tit! Your type really makes me puke, you vacuous, coffee-nosed, maloderous, pervert!
[right][snapback]77912[/snapback][/right]
Now that was just completely uncalled for!
How rude!
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Archon_Wing - 05-19-2005
Quote: Have you not read Kant? Hegel? Cleese? Bryson? And if you have, why haven't you taken the books back to the library, they are six weeks overdue! :angry:
Hey! I would be able to read them if you hadn't hogged them since God knows when. And what of those other pieces of "literature" that you took and didn't bring up?
:blink:
Quote: In the theme of attacking the poster and not the post, I will point out that:
Your sig is an unsupported assertion, not a fact. :lol: You wanna back it up with argument, or are you going to parade your inability to form a coherent thought the way a baboon parades his exposed glutes? :w00t:
You know, a real argument would not degrade into personal attacks. Communist! Racist! Nazi! Terrioist! You're probaly all of those!
Quote:Have you never read a newspaper? Have you never read one of my, or Doc's, posts? :unsure:
Yes, I have read yours and DOC's posts. They do have in much in common with a newspaper-- not worth more than 50 cents.
Quote:This post was brought to you by Keds, the gymnasts shoes. "Tricks are for Keds."
Occhi
[right][snapback]77863[/snapback][/right]
Sounds pretty nasty.
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - gothmog - 05-19-2005
Archon_Wing,May 19 2005, 05:40 AM Wrote:I find it really funny that you at the Lurker Lounge would want to keep your elitism.
[right][snapback]77845[/snapback][/right]
Ist that you Brian Weissman? Still bitter about the thing 3 years ago? ;)
j/k, Archon.
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Archon_Wing - 05-19-2005
Tal,May 19 2005, 09:55 AM Wrote:Just what I've come to expect from years of public schooling! Shut your festering gob, you tit! Your type really makes me puke, you vacuous, coffee-nosed, maloderous, pervert!
[right][snapback]77912[/snapback][/right]
Now Freud would have some insight on the problems in your post. Go read it, since I'm not going to bother to explain it.
About the elitism of the Lurker Lounge - Archon_Wing - 05-19-2005
Doc,May 19 2005, 09:21 AM Wrote:Ignorant troll!
I bet you say nuclear as NU-KU-LAHR!
And hell, I even say potatoe!
Quote:Illegitimate spawn of Jane Fonda and Janet Reno...
:blink: :blink: :blink: :blink: Now, that is just an example of the low standards that this forum has degraded to. I wouldn't wish that image on the battle.net Wacraft III forums, much less anyone else. Continue with your anarchy and unrestricted sex!
Quote:Edited for spelling errors, but not for content. Blah.Typical.
[right][snapback]77900[/snapback][/right]