+- The Lurker Lounge Forums (https://www.lurkerlounge.com/forums)
+-- Forum: The Lurker Lounge (https://www.lurkerlounge.com/forums/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://www.lurkerlounge.com/forums/forum-12.html)
+--- Thread: Bush's supreme court nominee (/thread-5998.html)
Bush's supreme court nominee - Minionman - 07-21-2005
linky.
Bush's supreme court nominee - Alram - 07-21-2005
I assume the immature apparently inaccurate remark in the opening sentence was placed by somebody with an axe to grind, and will be removed.
Bush's supreme court nominee - Doc - 07-22-2005
I think that his son breaking out in to dance was amusing.
As a side note, the whole damn family looks like a creepy throwback to some 50's sitcom. The boy was dressed like whatsisname, Butch Patrick from the Munsters.
Bush's supreme court nominee - Any1 - 07-22-2005
Alram,Jul 21 2005, 11:50 PM Wrote:I assume the immature apparently inaccurate remark in the opening sentence was placed by somebody with an axe to grind, and will be removed.
[right][snapback]84032[/snapback][/right]
I failed to notice anything immature/inaccurate, to which opening sentence are you referring?
"John Glover Roberts, Jr. (born January 27, 1955) is an American attorney, jurist, and political figure. He is currently a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit."
Bush's supreme court nominee - [vL]Kp - 07-22-2005
As noted in the header of that page, the page is subject to extremely rapid revision. I checked the timestamps of the posts here and dug up the version of the page which had been displayed when Alram posted. A quick scan of the history of the page shows it has been defaced at least twice in the past few hours, and both instances have been promptly reverted by Wikipedia members. By the time Any1 posted, it was already fixed (again).
Bush's supreme court nominee - Any1 - 07-22-2005
[vL]Kp,Jul 22 2005, 05:36 AM Wrote:As noted in the header of that page, the page is subject to extremely rapid revision. I checked the timestamps of the posts here and dug up the version of the page which had been displayed when Alram posted. A quick scan of the history of the page shows it has been defaced at least twice in the past few hours, and both instances have been promptly reverted by Wikipedia members. By the time Any1 posted, it was already fixed (again).
[right][snapback]84044[/snapback][/right]
Ahhh, I got it. :)