Quote:Offer good only in the USA (sorry to you European Net Surfers).

DeeBye,Dec 21 2005, 10:28 PM Wrote:Hey thanks!

OH NO!
Not even a mention of us unfortunate Canadians.  Now how will I get a minty fresh condom for free?  :angry:
[right][snapback]97760[/snapback][/right]

Doc,Dec 21 2005, 11:35 PM Wrote:Sorry DeeBye... I need to find a freebie that works for Canuckistan.

As I recall, you didn't get any lube either... My apologies.
[right][snapback]97763[/snapback][/right]

DeeBye,Dec 22 2005, 12:25 AM Wrote:It's like there is an American conspiracy to keep sex-related product freebies out of Canada  :angry:

It's a good thing that we can still get all cuddly with our significant others without these gimmicky goods.  We have years of practice getting close to each other under the covers when it gets cold, the way nature intended :)

As for the free crackpipe thing provided by the government, that's news to me  :blink:

I thank you anyways for your Christmas Gift :)
[right][snapback]97771[/snapback][/right]

Doc,Dec 22 2005, 01:30 AM Wrote:Been all over the news here... People are freaked out about it. Some health officials are handing out free needles for junkies... And free crack pipes as well to control the spread of unsightly herpes sores on the lips of Canadian citizens.
[right][snapback]97772[/snapback][/right]

DeeBye,Dec 22 2005, 12:01 AM Wrote:I hope this doesn't turn into a drug thread.  This is a SEX thread.

YZilla,Dec 22 2005, 03:38 AM Wrote:The Canadian supreme court today ruled that group sex and partner swapping are totally legal. (http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2005/12/21/SCOC-swingers-051221.html)

I think this puts us back on track...
[right][snapback]97781[/snapback][/right]

DeeBye,Dec 22 2005, 01:58 AM Wrote:Good show.  You have done your part.

More sex and less free crackpipe.
[right][snapback]97783[/snapback][/right]

Occhidiangela,Dec 22 2005, 09:49 AM Wrote:Slow news day, eh?  :P

1.  Wrap it, and while we are on the topic of wrapping, how about we wrap this one up?  I am suggesting we lock this thread before it expands like a virulent weed into the fertile ground for rather pointless ruminations and commentary on sensual matters best left to other forums.

Yes, I like dirty jokes, but this goes beyond suggestion . . .

Occhi
[right][snapback]97794[/snapback][/right]

Doc,Dec 22 2005, 03:18 PM Wrote:My only intent was to offer up a Christmas Freebie, that, being the responsible adults that we are, could actually use. It's sort of like getting socks for the holidays, only better, because you can look forward to trying this on.
[right][snapback]97797[/snapback][/right]

Count Duckula,Dec 22 2005, 10:59 AM Wrote:Hey, free Trojans are free Trojans! And there ARE eight nights of Hanukkah after all...
[right][snapback]97802[/snapback][/right]

Count Duckula,Dec 22 2005, 09:59 AM Wrote:Hey, free Trojans are free Trojans! And there ARE eight nights of Hanukkah after all...
[right][snapback]97802[/snapback][/right]

Doc,Dec 22 2005, 08:18 AM Wrote:I dunno... I think we can behave our selves.

My only intent was to offer up a Christmas Freebie, that, being the responsible adults that we are, could actually use. It's sort of like getting socks for the holidays, only better, because you can look forward to trying this on.
[right][snapback]97797[/snapback][/right]

Griselda,Dec 22 2005, 11:34 AM Wrote:I don't think he was talking about the original post.  The question is- where is the thread going from here?
[right][snapback]97807[/snapback][/right]

Occhidiangela,Dec 22 2005, 04:09 PM Wrote:You can watch Trojans, using the prevent defense, wrap themselves around Longhorn ball carriers on January 4th, 2006 in the Rose Bowl, either live in Pasadena, CA (if you can get your hands on tickets) or on TV if you can receive ABC broadcasts.

[right][snapback]97804[/snapback][/right]

GenericKen,Dec 23 2005, 01:49 PM Wrote:The Trojans don't *have* a prevent defense. They force fumbles and get interceptions to try to get good field position for the offense, but preventing yards and 1st downs? It's not something they do.

It does make the games interesting to watch, though.
[right][snapback]97924[/snapback][/right]

Occhidiangela,Dec 23 2005, 08:04 PM Wrote:I guess that little bit of word play on a condom's preventive qualities, meant to go with the wrapping around bit, did not match the real USC defensive scheme.

Sorry, I don't watch USC beyond ESPN highlights, so I plead sheer ignorance.

Booo Hiss.

Occhi
[right][snapback]97928[/snapback][/right]

GenericKen,Dec 23 2005, 02:38 PM Wrote:And you couldn't pun around with "Fumble", "Down", "Sack", "Reciever", "Pocket", or "Scrum"? You have failed the English language, and yourself as a man!

At least, I presume you're a guy. I dunno. Either way I guess it makes sense. Whatevers.
[right][snapback]97937[/snapback][/right]

Occhidiangela,Dec 23 2005, 04:52 PM Wrote:Scrum is rugby, sack is not where a condom is wrapped.  Pocket . . . didn't scan.

"Fumble" conradicts the successful wrapping.  Needed to stay internally consistent.

"Tight end and wide receiver" Completely missed  the boat.

Woe is me, my ribaldry license will be revoked!  What shall I do, what shall I do?  :wacko:

*hangs necktie over garage door support.  Climbs on to chair*

"Good bye, cruel world, it's been good knowin' you all!"  :(

Occhi
[right][snapback]97943[/snapback][/right]