The Lurker Lounge Forums
The Fools Strike Again - Printable Version

+- The Lurker Lounge Forums (https://www.lurkerlounge.com/forums)
+-- Forum: The Lurker Lounge (https://www.lurkerlounge.com/forums/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://www.lurkerlounge.com/forums/forum-12.html)
+--- Thread: The Fools Strike Again (/thread-6411.html)

Pages: 1 2 3


The Fools Strike Again - Guest - 05-11-2005

Rinnhart,May 11 2005, 04:13 PM Wrote:He can argue rhetoric and dialectics, Quark; he doesn't need a point.
[right][snapback]77010[/snapback][/right]

Actually my first response was completely on the subject. It definetly hadnt "won" or "proved"anything, but it was a reasonable disagreement. He should have either reponded on kind or ignored it.


The Fools Strike Again - Quark - 05-11-2005

Ghostiger,May 11 2005, 05:38 PM Wrote:Actually my first response was completely on the subject.  It definetly hadnt "won" or "proved"anything, but it was a reasonable disagreement. He should have either reponded on kind or ignored it.
[right][snapback]77012[/snapback][/right]

The green aliens are more important than the red aliens. There's a response with no backing, evidence, or support of any kind. I liken it to yours until you actually try to back your own up.


The Fools Strike Again - Guest - 05-11-2005

You really dont get it.


You cheated. Now you dont get to play. All you get is my boring lecture.


The Fools Strike Again - Quark - 05-11-2005

Ghostiger,May 11 2005, 06:19 PM Wrote:You really dont get it. 
You cheated. Now you dont get to play. All you get is my boring lecture.
[right][snapback]77015[/snapback][/right]

There's two reasons for someone to not defend their own point. One, it could be poorly thought out and the person has no defense for it. Or two, the person never believed it in the first place and was just trying to start a fight.

My first point was short and succint simply because I had no time for a detailed post. I was going to work. Your next 10 posts had no point whatsoever.

You're nothing but a common troll.


The Fools Strike Again - Occhidiangela - 05-11-2005

Quark,May 11 2005, 04:44 PM Wrote:There's two reasons for someone to not defend their own point.  One, it could be poorly thought out and the person has no defense for it.  Or two, the person never believed it in the first place and was just trying to start a fight.

My first point was short and succint simply because I had no time for a detailed post.  I was going to work.  Your next 10 posts had no point whatsoever.

You're nothing but a common troll.
[right][snapback]77017[/snapback][/right]

Ghostiger, Quark: When you two are done with this pissing contest, please wipe up.

(Don't panic, I always carry a towel . . . ) ;)

Occhi


The Fools Strike Again - Rinnhart - 05-12-2005

Quark,May 11 2005, 02:44 PM Wrote:There's two reasons for someone to not defend their own point.  One, it could be poorly thought out and the person has no defense for it.  Or two, the person never believed it in the first place and was just trying to start a fight.

My first point was short and succint simply because I had no time for a detailed post.  I was going to work.  Your next 10 posts had no point whatsoever.

You're nothing but a common troll.
[right][snapback]77017[/snapback][/right]

I, for one, enjoy being beaten over the head with Ghostiger's endless nuance and subtle wit whilst simultaneously being junked for not clarifying my every comment.